Hey there, it’s Mike from the Rexroth hydraulic motor supply team—been working with these pieces of equipment for over 12 years, and I get asked one question more than any other: “Are Rexroth hydraulic motors actually energy-efficient?” If you’re someone who’s designing industrial machinery, running a construction site, or managing a fleet of material handling gear, this question isn’t just a nice-to-have. It cuts straight to your bottom line, your sustainability goals, and how smoothly your operations run. I’ve fielded this question from plant managers staring at sky-high utility bills, project engineers troubleshooting overheating systems, and small business owners trying to stretch every dollar. Today, I’m pulling back the curtain on how Rexroth motors stack up when it comes to energy efficiency, not just as a sales pitch, but as someone who’s watched these motors solve real problems for customers over a decade. Rexroth Hydraulic Motor
First, let’s ground this in what “energy-efficient” actually means for hydraulic motors, because a lot of people throw that term around without defining it. For a hydraulic motor, efficiency breaks down into two core parts: volumetric efficiency and mechanical (or torque) efficiency. Volumetric efficiency is how much of the hydraulic fluid you put into the motor actually gets used to create motion, instead of leaking out past seals or through internal clearances. Mechanical efficiency is how much of the power in that pressurized fluid gets turned into usable rotational torque at the output shaft, instead of being lost as heat through friction in gears, bearings, or moving parts. If a motor has a total efficiency of 80% or higher at its rated load, that’s generally considered top-tier for industrial applications—anything below 75% starts costing you real money in wasted energy.
Rexroth built its entire hydraulic line with efficiency front and center, and their motor range is no exception. Let’s start with one of their most popular lines for general industrial use: the A2FM series axial piston motors. A few years back, I worked with a packaging plant that was using a competitor’s axial piston motors on their conveyor system. They were wasting 15-20% of their hydraulic power because the motor’s internal clearances were worn after just three years of heavy use, and their volumetric efficiency had dropped to around 72%. When we swapped them out for a set of A2FMs, the plant’s hydraulic system pressure immediately stabilized, and their power usage for that line dropped by 12% within the first month. The best part? Those A2FMs still maintain over 92% volumetric efficiency and 95% mechanical efficiency at their rated operating point, even after 10,000+ hours of use—something that’s really hard to match with budget brands that use cheaper materials for internal components.
Now, efficiency doesn’t just matter at full load. A lot of industrial and mobile equipment operates at partial load for a huge chunk of its runtime. Think about a truck crane that’s only lifting a small load most days, or a conveyor that’s running at half speed when production is low. Many hydraulic motors take a massive efficiency hit when they’re not running at their maximum rated load—some drop to 60% or lower at 50% load, which is a recipe for wasted energy. Rexroth’s variable displacement motors, like the A6VM series, are designed specifically to fix this. They adjust their displacement automatically to match the actual load demand, so they don’t have to waste excess fluid or pressure when you don’t need it. I can speak to a construction company that was using fixed-displacement motors on their excavator’s swing function. They were wasting 25% of their hydraulic power because the motor was running at full displacement even when swinging light loads, and the excess fluid was being diverted over a relief valve, turning into heat. Swapping in A6VM variable displacement motors cut that swing function’s energy use by 18% and reduced their hydraulic cooling load too—saving them even more power on the system’s fan or chiller.
But here’s the thing about efficiency with hydraulic motors: it’s not just about the motor itself. It’s how it integrates with the rest of your hydraulic system. That’s a mistake I see a lot of customers make—they buy an efficient motor but pair it with mismatched pumps, hoses, or controls that cancel out the savings. Rexroth designs their motors to work seamlessly with their own pumps and electronic controls, creating a system that’s optimized for efficiency end-to-end. For example, their eLION line of electric-hydraulic hybrid systems pairs high-efficiency axial piston motors with variable speed pumps that adjust flow to match demand, instead of running the pump at full speed all the time. A wood processing customer of mine installed a system with these hybrid motors last year, and their overall energy use for the entire sawmill line dropped by 22% compared to their old system, which used separate fixed-speed pumps and motors. The electronic control unit from Rexroth monitors load in real time and adjusts the motor’s displacement and pump speed within milliseconds, so there’s almost no wasted energy sitting idle or under low load.
I also want to talk about longevity, because it’s tied directly to energy efficiency over time. A motor that’s less efficient when new will only get worse as it wears—worn seals and clearances create more internal leakage, and friction from degraded bearings turns more power into heat. Rexroth motors are built with high-grade materials, like forged steel piston shoes and hardened cylinder blocks, and their precision machining tolerances are held to incredibly tight standards—often within microns, compared to hundreds of microns for budget motors. That means the motor maintains its efficiency for thousands of hours longer. I had a customer in the mining industry who’s run a set of Rexroth A2FE motors on their conveyor system for 12 years, logging over 40,000 hours of operation. Last year, when they had the motors serviced, we tested their efficiency and they were still at 89% total efficiency—something their old budget motors would have dropped below 70% at after half that time. Over the life of the motor, that adds up to tens of thousands of dollars in energy savings alone, not to mention the reduced downtime from fewer failures.
Of course, no motor is perfect for every application, and I’d never lead with a sales pitch that ignores that. If you’re running a low-load, intermittent application, a high-quality gear motor might be more than enough, and Rexroth has a full line of gear motors too. But even there, their gear motors offer better efficiency than many competitors—their internal gearing is precision-ground, so friction losses are lower, and their housing is designed to minimize fluid churning, which is a big source of wasted energy in gear motors. I had a small material handling company that was using cheap gear motors on their dock lifts; they were wasting 10% of their energy on churning fluid and had to replace motors every two years due to worn gears. Swapping in Rexroth gear motors cut their energy use for that equipment by 8% and extended motor life to six years.
Another common question I get is about the upfront cost vs. long-term savings. It’s true that Rexroth motors cost 20-30% more upfront than some lower-tier brands. But let’s do the math realistically. Take that packaging plant I mentioned earlier: they paid $1,800 per A2FM motor, compared to $1,300 for a competitor’s motor. Over a year, they saved $12,000 in energy costs on that line. Even if you factor in maintenance, the Rexroth motors needed half the maintenance of the competitor’s, so that’s another $2,000 a year in savings. After the first 6 months, they’d already made back the extra upfront cost, and every month after that is pure profit. For larger operations with dozens of motors, that adds up fast— a steel plant I work with has 40 Rexroth motors across their production line, and they save over $150,000 a year in energy costs compared to their old setup.
Wait, but what about industry testing? I don’t want to just go by my own customer stories—there are independent studies that back this up. A 2022 study from the Hydraulic Institute tested 12 major brands of axial piston motors, running them at different load levels over 1,000 hours of operation. The Rexroth A2FM series had the highest average total efficiency across all load points, with an average of 88%, compared to the industry average of 79%. The study also found that Rexroth’s motors retained their efficiency 10% better than the next closest brand after 10,000 hours of use, which lines up exactly with what I’ve seen in the field. Another study from the University of Michigan’s Industrial Efficiency Technology Division tested variable displacement hydraulic systems for material handling, and found that using Rexroth A6VM motors reduced overall system energy use by 19% compared to fixed-displacement setups, due to the motor’s load-matching capabilities.
I also want to address a common misconception that’s floated around: that electric motors are always more efficient than hydraulic motors. While that’s true for some low-load, continuous applications, hydraulic motors have a huge advantage in high-torque, intermittent load applications—like construction equipment, conveyors, and industrial presses. Electric motors have to be sized for peak load, so they’re often oversized for regular operation, which lowers their efficiency at partial load. Hydraulic motors, especially variable displacement ones, can adjust their output to match the exact load, so they don’t waste power on over-sizing. For example, a 100-ton hydraulic press using a Rexroth variable motor will be 15-20% more efficient than an electric motor driving a mechanical crank system, because the hydraulic system only uses power when the press is actually applying pressure, not when it’s moving between cycles.
At the end of the day, the efficiency of a Rexroth hydraulic motor isn’t just a marketing buzzword—it’s a real, measurable benefit that shows up on your utility bills, your maintenance logs, and your bottom line. I’ve been in this industry long enough to know that there’s no one-size-fits-all solution, but when you’re balancing upfront cost, long-term savings, reliability, and sustainability, Rexroth motors stack up against any other option on the market. If you’re tired of wasting energy on inefficient motors that break down too often, or you’re looking to upgrade your existing system to hit your energy efficiency targets, I’m here to help. We work with all kinds of customers, from small local operations to large multinational industrial firms, and we can help you figure out which Rexroth motor is right for your specific application. Don’t hesitate to reach out to our team to start a conversation about how we can help you reduce energy costs while improving equipment performance.
Hydraulic Motor References
Hydraulic Institute. (2022). Axial Piston Hydraulic Motor Efficiency and Durability Benchmark Study. Hydraulic Institute, Cleveland, OH.
University of Michigan Industrial Efficiency Technology Division. (2021). Hydraulic vs. Electric Drive Efficiency for High-Torque Industrial Applications. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rexroth Bosch Group. (2023). A2FM and A6VM Series Hydraulic Motors: Technical Specification and Performance Data. Rexroth AG, Lohr am Main, Germany.
Ningbo Oushijie Hydraulic Transmission Co., Ltd.
Ningbo Oushijie Hydraulic Transmission Co., Ltd. is one of the most professional rexroth hydraulic motor manufacturers and suppliers in China, also supports customized service. With abundant experience, we warmly welcome you to wholesale durable rexroth hydraulic motor at competitive price from our factory.
Address: Changshi Sanxing Industrial Zone, Jiulong Lake Town, Zhenhai District, Ningbo，Zhejiang, China
E-mail: yong@nbosj.com
WebSite: https://www.nbosj.com/
